Every day, judges and prosecutors make complex decisions about whether young offenders should be tried as juveniles or adults. But in the past 30 years, our assumptions have come nearly full circle, as states have decided that more adolescents like Anthony belong in adult criminal court. This push to treat more kids as adults, however, is contradicted by new behavioral and biological research about maturity and criminal culpability, as well as evidence from the criminal-justice system about how adult court affects children.
When an individual commits such an offense, even if his certified age is below the categorisation for the adult, but their mind is working far beyond their age. The girl is made handicapped with respect to her self-esteem, confidence, respect, courage apart from the physical trauma.
This combined physical and mental assault on a female is highly objectionable and definitely needs to be punished severely. The pain and trauma of the girl could not be relieved with the punishment of the accused, but we can save many other females of our society from that particular accused.
The punishment should be severe to the extent that others should not even think if committing such an offense. If accused escapes such a crime under the cover of being a juvenile, then it will be a booster for other under age individuals to escape smartly by committing brutal offenses.
I feel in our constitution defination of adult should be revised particularly for rapes and murders. Everyone who is promoting the idea of not punishing juvenile strickly ,please do give a thought to those who lost thier kith and kins in such type of accident. Since our judicial system has failed to punish our adult for such a heinous crime how can we think that it will make provision to punish juvenile.
A person should be judged by the extent of crime he has committed. In case of juvenile rapists, if they have the knowledge of what insane act they are doing then how can they be treated as child or by giving less punishment does not compensate for their sins.
Otherwise there are chances of it becoming a habit that can carry on till later life of that person.
If such actions of teenagers are ignored then it will motivate other juveniles to do the same crime and get away and this would result in increase in crimes.
In fact there should be strict laws for discouraging young children from committing such crimes. This needs to be stopped and the only way to stop the same is to start treating their violent behaviour with strict actions.
If teenagers are adult enough to do such crime then they are adult enough to be punished for that crime. As it is dependent on the mental state of the individual rather than the age of the person. Criminality is in the mind and not in the age. Hence should be punished accordingly. Looking at the current social scenario where children are being exposed to, there is a need to re-think the juvenile age.
In that age they lack the ability to decide what is right and what is wrong for them. They do not have the same thought processes that adults have. They act on emotions or wants, without thinking about their actions completely.
Hence they should not be treated with any harsh punishment rather be given a chance to rehabilitate and motivate them to take the right path. Thus, these factors should be considered while treating juvenile rapists as adults. Government should let juveniles remain in the juvenile justice system in order to protect their physical and mental health, giving them a better chance at rehabilitation for the crime they committed.A 15 year old commits a crime, depending on the seriousness of the crime, that child should be treated as an adult.
Children in the past have been given many but not all of the due process protection that is recognized in adult criminal courts, so why can’t children be treated as adults if they. Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?.
An opinion piece by Professor Terry Maroney. and saying so doesn’t make it so. Besides, we don’t really mean it: When we try them in criminal court, we don’t deem them adults for other purposes, such as voting and drinking. Terry A. Maroney joined the Vanderbilt Law faculty as assistant.
Feb 18, · Editor's note: Robert Schwartz co-founded the Juvenile Law Center in and has been its executive director since The center is a nonprofit public interest law firm that uses the law .
There will also be a fine line when and where teenagers should be tried in a court of law as an adult or juvenile. Should teens who commit serious crimes be sentenced as adults?I believe yes. 13/. Sentencing. Last updated 21 April (a) The Legislative Framework.
Get the latest breaking news across the U.S. on pfmlures.com Should the U.S. justice system treat juvenile violent offenders as adults? YES. The end result of a heinous crime remains the same, no matter who commits it. Our justice system depends upon holding perpetrators responsible for their actions. Harsh sentencing acts as a deterrent to kids who are considering committing crimes. Trying children as adults has coincided with lower rates of juvenile . Teens today don't fear the law because they don't think they will get caught. And if they do, they know they have a good chance of getting off because they are tried as teens and not adults. We have to get tougher on crime. There should be a law that everyone over eleven years old will be tried as adults.
The Purposes of Sentencing. The purposes of sentencing are set out in s. 3A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act as follows: (a) to ensure that the offender is adequately punished for the offence. Juvenile rapists should be treated same as adults in the court of law A juvenile is a person who is below the age of 18 years.
The recent Delhi gang rape accused was a minor and was the most ferocious out of all, has enticed everybody’s attention.