Patricia Fox, an Albany surgeon who has the courage of her convictions and the temerity to take on the medical community in her hometown. She wrote a stunning op-ed in the Albany Times-Union, which I will share here in a moment. Her point is that medical testing has been made obsolete by technology and should go the way of trephining.
Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Use an editor to spell check essay. Animal experimentation has been a commonly debated subject for many years, is it cruelty or science? This is because of harsh ways animals are treated like by their experimenters.
Animals should be free of the cruelty scientists expose them to because they have just as much sentient as humans do. I think animal testing is cruelty more than science. Animals are not treated well and are often abused by their handlers.
Small animals share a shoe box sized cage with at least eight other small animals. That's no way to live. Imagine stuffing eight human beings into a regular sized bedroom.
Where are you all going to sleep or get dressed? Animals will be held down by metal bands or locked in small cages with a hole cut out for the animals head to be trapped into, so they can not move around and be a hassle while being tested on. An ats lab in North Carolina stuffs monkeys in tubes.
Another harsh thing handlers do is take out dog's vocal chords so they don't disturb the lab workers. As for death to an animal; the experimenters will euthanize the animal after being tested on or will use the animal again for further testing until they are dead or useless.
If you don't believe the cruel ways animals are treated, go on youtube and search for: Animals are not just objects. They have feelings and can think, just like us humans do. Rene Descartes, a French philosopher and scientist, said people have the right to use animals just as if they were machines.
The more similar the animal is to a human the more intelligent and sentient the animal is, so the more immoral and wrong it is to use the animal as a biological object. Descartes also believed only humans have feelings and could think.
If this were true animals wouldn't flinch and whimper when needles are injected in them or when testers put drops of cologne in the animals' eye. Scientists use animals for testing products to make humans lives better right? That's what I thought too. Well, many experiments that were approved to be available to human beings have later been recalled for safety issues or harmful side affects.
Is animal testing very reliable? If products have to be withdrawn from stores and human use, then that in it self should say something.Animal testing is the use of non-human animals used in the experiments in order to research into basic biology and various diseases and testing the effectiveness and side effects of new drugs before being used on human beings.
Nov 16, · Debate: That animal testing should be banned.? Unfortunately I am on the negative side in this debate. I would like to know some facts/arguments/rebuttles about COSMETICS and animal testing.
as many as half the drugs that have been approved in the US and the UK after animal testing have subsequently had to be withdrawn because of Status: Resolved.
Bill to Ban Animal Testing for Cosmetics in the United States Introduced. By Monica Engebretson. It is time for the United States to catch up with modern advancements, consumer.
Meanwhile Congress should embrace the future and pass the Humane Cosmetics Act (H.R.
), which would prohibit animal testing in the U.S. cosmetics industry and gradually eliminate from the U.S. Background and context Animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation. It is estimated that 50 to million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually.
Jan 31, · Sami takes place in a TV debate on whether animal testing should be banned. He had 10 minutes to prepare his argument for why animal testing should be banned.
No copyright infringement is intended.